nobody
05-09 04:18 PM
:sigh:
wallpaper selena gomez bikini with
freedom_fighter
06-23 09:51 PM
Hi,
I've read conflicting information on whether one is eligible to receive unemployment benefits.
Specifically, i understand as a primary applicant in AOS status, one can not claim such benefits. But how about a derivative spouse, working on EAD , who lost her job? Can she claim such benefits as unemployment insurance. I've read that unemployment insurance should NOT be construed as a public charge, since its paid by the employer , when the employee is working.
So is it safe to get the basic unemployment benefits for a derivative spouse working in AOS status?
thanks
I've read conflicting information on whether one is eligible to receive unemployment benefits.
Specifically, i understand as a primary applicant in AOS status, one can not claim such benefits. But how about a derivative spouse, working on EAD , who lost her job? Can she claim such benefits as unemployment insurance. I've read that unemployment insurance should NOT be construed as a public charge, since its paid by the employer , when the employee is working.
So is it safe to get the basic unemployment benefits for a derivative spouse working in AOS status?
thanks
NH123
06-27 02:21 PM
bump^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
2011 pictures selena gomez bikini
jliechty
January 3rd, 2005, 06:19 PM
Wow, very interesting. Though I might experiment with cropping (first try would be cutting off the bottom, including the one bird down there, to make it more panoramic and [hopefully] make the horizon less centered), there's not really anything that I'd change about this photo. Good work, IMHO. :)
more...
cooolvick
08-14 01:42 AM
Hi all,
I think my scenario is little complicated.I have my I140 (EB3) cleared with previous employer and my current company has filed new labor and I140 (EB2). They are trying to capture the priority date of my old I140 approval (August 2006).
While my current I140 is still going on, can I apply for I1-485 due to sudden improvement shown for EB2 category in September Visa bulletin.
Please advice.
Thanks,
Vikram
I think my scenario is little complicated.I have my I140 (EB3) cleared with previous employer and my current company has filed new labor and I140 (EB2). They are trying to capture the priority date of my old I140 approval (August 2006).
While my current I140 is still going on, can I apply for I1-485 due to sudden improvement shown for EB2 category in September Visa bulletin.
Please advice.
Thanks,
Vikram
emeraldth
01-05 04:14 PM
For my case, it looks not very easy to keep the same job title after switching employer. So I'm wondering whether anyone has the experience about how to persuade current employer not to revoke my I-140?
My situation is that the managers of quite a few departments in my current employer like me, but these managers are not getting well with each other. So I actually cannot enjoy this and am suffering the politics. And my pay is quite low, much lower than what I got in previous IT company although at that time I was a very fresh graduate, and also lower than the prevailing pay in this industry in the same city. The only reason I joined this one was for family reason.
My situation is that the managers of quite a few departments in my current employer like me, but these managers are not getting well with each other. So I actually cannot enjoy this and am suffering the politics. And my pay is quite low, much lower than what I got in previous IT company although at that time I was a very fresh graduate, and also lower than the prevailing pay in this industry in the same city. The only reason I joined this one was for family reason.
more...
hpandey
06-15 01:14 PM
:DI am wondering if Anti immigrants are complaining about them too...
Like they are taking away chance from American Citizen basketball players and if they are supressing the NBA player's wages etc etc.... :D:D
I guess we should send this to Lou Dobbs and Mr. Grassley too !! This is highly unfair - only American citizens should be allowed in NBA, MLB , NFL etc etc. :D
Just let them bring a resolution and next year half the teams would be empty.;)
Like they are taking away chance from American Citizen basketball players and if they are supressing the NBA player's wages etc etc.... :D:D
I guess we should send this to Lou Dobbs and Mr. Grassley too !! This is highly unfair - only American citizens should be allowed in NBA, MLB , NFL etc etc. :D
Just let them bring a resolution and next year half the teams would be empty.;)
2010 selena gomez bikini 2011
Blog Feeds
05-27 08:30 AM
President Obama will send up to 1,200 National Guard troops to the Southwest border and increase spending on law enforcement, yielding to demands from both Republican and Democratic lawmakers there that border security be tightened, administration officials said.
That was the opening of an article in the New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/26/us/26border.html?partner=rss&emc=rss). Here are additional excerpts:
Homeland Security officials said that the troops would provide support to law enforcement officers already working along the border by helping observe and monitor traffic between official crossing points, and would help analyze trafficking patterns in hopes of intercepting illegal drug shipments. They performed similar tasks in an earlier deployment along the border from 2006 to 2008, when they also assisted with road and fence construction. The troops have not been involved directly in intercepting border crossers.
In addition to the soldiers, the White House said it would request $500 million in supplemental funds to pay for more federal agents, prosecutors, investigators and technology at the border.
Homeland Security officials have said that they have significantly increased border security efforts since Mr. Obama took office. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, a former governor of Arizona, said last month that the border was “as secure now as it has ever been,” though she conceded there was room for improvement. Critics on the right derided her remarks as out of touch.
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Immigration-law-answers-blog/~3/ERNnamVYvK8/)
That was the opening of an article in the New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/26/us/26border.html?partner=rss&emc=rss). Here are additional excerpts:
Homeland Security officials said that the troops would provide support to law enforcement officers already working along the border by helping observe and monitor traffic between official crossing points, and would help analyze trafficking patterns in hopes of intercepting illegal drug shipments. They performed similar tasks in an earlier deployment along the border from 2006 to 2008, when they also assisted with road and fence construction. The troops have not been involved directly in intercepting border crossers.
In addition to the soldiers, the White House said it would request $500 million in supplemental funds to pay for more federal agents, prosecutors, investigators and technology at the border.
Homeland Security officials have said that they have significantly increased border security efforts since Mr. Obama took office. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, a former governor of Arizona, said last month that the border was “as secure now as it has ever been,” though she conceded there was room for improvement. Critics on the right derided her remarks as out of touch.
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Immigration-law-answers-blog/~3/ERNnamVYvK8/)
more...
Blog Feeds
01-20 07:00 AM
Immigration Law from Houston Immigration Lawyer - Annie Banerjee Has Just Posted the Following:
The DOL introduced a new Prevailing Wage system which will centralize everything. Previously each State's Workforce Agency gave those Prevailing Wage. Obviously there were discrepancies in how each SWA operated causing problems with DOL filings.
However, DOL introduced this new system of centralized Prevailing Wage determination with no computerized system of filing. We have to mail in our request to the DOL. Then the DOL will take forever to come up with a Prevailing Wage. The DOL has advised employers to file the Prevailing Wage 60 days prior to advertising for a PERM, since the ads expire in 6 months. This is strange because the DOL went computerized much earlier than the CIS did. Why could they not have a faster computerized process BEFORE centralizing the whole process? Was this then intentional?
This will slow down businesses, and filing of immigration. Similarly in July of 2009 the DOL significantly slowed down the LCA filings for H-1Bs. Which makes me wonder if DOL is slowing down things as a protectionist measure which caters to socialism? Is this the death of free enterprise, and business at the speed of 21 Century? It was another Democratic President and Congress that passed the AC 21 to speed the process up about a decade ago.
Contact Houston Immigration Lawyer (http://www.visatous.com), Annie Banerjee for more detailshttps://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8629098317507537197-6058636719390437264?l=usimmigrationmatters.blogspo t.com
More... (http://usimmigrationmatters.blogspot.com/2010/01/is-dol-becoming-socialist.html)
The DOL introduced a new Prevailing Wage system which will centralize everything. Previously each State's Workforce Agency gave those Prevailing Wage. Obviously there were discrepancies in how each SWA operated causing problems with DOL filings.
However, DOL introduced this new system of centralized Prevailing Wage determination with no computerized system of filing. We have to mail in our request to the DOL. Then the DOL will take forever to come up with a Prevailing Wage. The DOL has advised employers to file the Prevailing Wage 60 days prior to advertising for a PERM, since the ads expire in 6 months. This is strange because the DOL went computerized much earlier than the CIS did. Why could they not have a faster computerized process BEFORE centralizing the whole process? Was this then intentional?
This will slow down businesses, and filing of immigration. Similarly in July of 2009 the DOL significantly slowed down the LCA filings for H-1Bs. Which makes me wonder if DOL is slowing down things as a protectionist measure which caters to socialism? Is this the death of free enterprise, and business at the speed of 21 Century? It was another Democratic President and Congress that passed the AC 21 to speed the process up about a decade ago.
Contact Houston Immigration Lawyer (http://www.visatous.com), Annie Banerjee for more detailshttps://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8629098317507537197-6058636719390437264?l=usimmigrationmatters.blogspo t.com
More... (http://usimmigrationmatters.blogspot.com/2010/01/is-dol-becoming-socialist.html)
hair Selena Gomez e Justin Bibier,
Ann Ruben
04-08 11:05 AM
Hi Xela,
I am so sorry for what you must be going through. There are certain visas/immigration law provisions to assist victims of violent crime. I would need more information about your particular circumstances in order to provide any useful guidance. If you would prefer not to share personal details in a public forum, please feel free to contact me confidentially by phone or e-mail.
With respect to your first query, as an applicant for AOS you will retain legal immigration status even if you engage in non-H-1B employment using an EAD. You will, however, lose "lawful non-immigrant (H-1B) status" if you perform work for any entity that has not petitioned for H-1B status on your behalf.
Keep in mind that merely applying for and obtaining an EAD has NO impact on your lawful H-1B status. So, given life's uncertainties, it's generally a good idea to obtain EAD and Advance Parole just in case H-1B employment is lost.
Hope this helps,
Ann
I am so sorry for what you must be going through. There are certain visas/immigration law provisions to assist victims of violent crime. I would need more information about your particular circumstances in order to provide any useful guidance. If you would prefer not to share personal details in a public forum, please feel free to contact me confidentially by phone or e-mail.
With respect to your first query, as an applicant for AOS you will retain legal immigration status even if you engage in non-H-1B employment using an EAD. You will, however, lose "lawful non-immigrant (H-1B) status" if you perform work for any entity that has not petitioned for H-1B status on your behalf.
Keep in mind that merely applying for and obtaining an EAD has NO impact on your lawful H-1B status. So, given life's uncertainties, it's generally a good idea to obtain EAD and Advance Parole just in case H-1B employment is lost.
Hope this helps,
Ann
more...
nashim
02-03 07:57 AM
One lost his job and opted for subsidized COBRA. After one month he got job from small company. New employer does not pay for health insurance and insurance premium is more than subsidized COBRA premium.
In this case, Is it ok to continue using subsidized COBRA even after getting new job?
Thanks,
In this case, Is it ok to continue using subsidized COBRA even after getting new job?
Thanks,
hot selena gomez bikini hawaii.
Blog Feeds
03-03 11:40 AM
Immigration Visa Attorney Blog Has Just Posted the Following:
When the Senate advanced the job-creation bill last week, employers were given the signal that hiring tax incentives are on the horizon. Perhaps in a nod to the Administration's No. 1 priority of creating jobs for unemployed Americans, the USCIS has just announced a forum on the EB-5 immigrant investor program. In the last year, and as recently as December 2009 (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.eb1d4c2a3e5b9ac89243c6a7543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=facb83453d4a3210VgnVCM100000b92ca60aRCR D&vgnextchannel=facb83453d4a3210VgnVCM100000b92ca60a RCRD), the USCIS issued updated guidance on I-526 and I-829 filings (http://www.uscis.gov/files/nativedocuments/eb5_17jun09.pdf) so that USCIS adjudications could make decisions with clarity and consistency, allowing investors to make job creation through the EB-5 program a reality soon as possible. These are all indications that this is the time for foreign investors to again bring private enterprise to our great nation.
The upcoming USCIS EB-5 forum is only open to attorneys representing these so-called "million dollar investors." Fong & Chun attorneys will be in attendance and ready to present concerns facing our clients as well as potential issues for those investors considering the EB-5 program.
It is true that the EB-5 investors greencard process is often called "hypertechnical," and has in the past been plagued by administrative delay and inconsistent treatment. But I believe that the view of recent USCIS' actions, the agency is acknowledging just how critical the EB-5 investors program is to our nation's economic recovery. For each EB-5 investment, 10 full-time jobs must be created, and that means 10 more working Americans. Call Fong & Chun, LLP if you would like to discuss how you can start investing in America. ---ecf
More... (http://www.immigrationvisaattorneyblog.com/2010/03/job-creation-options-for-forei.html)
When the Senate advanced the job-creation bill last week, employers were given the signal that hiring tax incentives are on the horizon. Perhaps in a nod to the Administration's No. 1 priority of creating jobs for unemployed Americans, the USCIS has just announced a forum on the EB-5 immigrant investor program. In the last year, and as recently as December 2009 (http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.eb1d4c2a3e5b9ac89243c6a7543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=facb83453d4a3210VgnVCM100000b92ca60aRCR D&vgnextchannel=facb83453d4a3210VgnVCM100000b92ca60a RCRD), the USCIS issued updated guidance on I-526 and I-829 filings (http://www.uscis.gov/files/nativedocuments/eb5_17jun09.pdf) so that USCIS adjudications could make decisions with clarity and consistency, allowing investors to make job creation through the EB-5 program a reality soon as possible. These are all indications that this is the time for foreign investors to again bring private enterprise to our great nation.
The upcoming USCIS EB-5 forum is only open to attorneys representing these so-called "million dollar investors." Fong & Chun attorneys will be in attendance and ready to present concerns facing our clients as well as potential issues for those investors considering the EB-5 program.
It is true that the EB-5 investors greencard process is often called "hypertechnical," and has in the past been plagued by administrative delay and inconsistent treatment. But I believe that the view of recent USCIS' actions, the agency is acknowledging just how critical the EB-5 investors program is to our nation's economic recovery. For each EB-5 investment, 10 full-time jobs must be created, and that means 10 more working Americans. Call Fong & Chun, LLP if you would like to discuss how you can start investing in America. ---ecf
More... (http://www.immigrationvisaattorneyblog.com/2010/03/job-creation-options-for-forei.html)
more...
house girlfriend Tag: Selena Gomez
hibworker
05-07 05:21 PM
We did the exact same thing. We informed officer that my wife's Extension is pending, he said that's fine and gave her I-94 valid for 40 days (time remaining on her H4 visa).
tattoo girlfriend selena gomez bikini
s416504
05-26 01:15 PM
a_yaja is 100% right. Is is upto port of entry(POE) officer to decide I-94 expiry date. Usually that will be 3 months to 6 months longer from the POE date.
more...
pictures Selena Gomez, Beach,Bikini
portland
02-10 10:48 AM
PLEASE HELP ME WITH ANSWERS ON ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS, APPROVED I360 VAWA AND INTERVIEW?
I just received an approved i360 vawa petition from VSC dated January 26, 2011. The petition was approved on December 20, 2010 and I have a pending I485, filed on January 2010 and I asked the local office during my interview to hold on to it till my VAWA I360 is approved. Now, my VAWA I360 has been approved, I would immensely appreciate your kind help if someone can help me with the following questions.
1. How long does it take for an approved VAWA I360 to get notified to National Benefit Center to link my pending I485 to my approved I360?
2. Has anyone ever experienced this situation and how long did it take before securing interview notice?
3. Do I need to contact the local office since I suspect my pending I485 should be at the NBC or do you think its been transferred to local office.
4. My work permit EAD is expiring on March 9th this year and I would like to renew it since I still have a pending I485 since April last year and approved I360 this year. Do you think I have to renew my EAD since I'm hoping to secure my green card soon rather than paying another $380 this week for my work permit renewal?
If you need additional information, do let me know.
I have read couple of things online but I would really appreciate if someone can help me out. Many thanks as look forward to hearing from you guys.
I just received an approved i360 vawa petition from VSC dated January 26, 2011. The petition was approved on December 20, 2010 and I have a pending I485, filed on January 2010 and I asked the local office during my interview to hold on to it till my VAWA I360 is approved. Now, my VAWA I360 has been approved, I would immensely appreciate your kind help if someone can help me with the following questions.
1. How long does it take for an approved VAWA I360 to get notified to National Benefit Center to link my pending I485 to my approved I360?
2. Has anyone ever experienced this situation and how long did it take before securing interview notice?
3. Do I need to contact the local office since I suspect my pending I485 should be at the NBC or do you think its been transferred to local office.
4. My work permit EAD is expiring on March 9th this year and I would like to renew it since I still have a pending I485 since April last year and approved I360 this year. Do you think I have to renew my EAD since I'm hoping to secure my green card soon rather than paying another $380 this week for my work permit renewal?
If you need additional information, do let me know.
I have read couple of things online but I would really appreciate if someone can help me out. Many thanks as look forward to hearing from you guys.
dresses selena gomez bikini 2011
InMess
03-21 03:48 PM
Hi Guys,
As i said earlier my I-140 was denied for the reason below
I have US masters and 4+years of US job experience and My I-140 was filed in EB2 using a Substitution labor which as the education/experience requirements of (14) Masters+1years experience or (15) Bachelors + 3Years Experience and it was denied without RFE saying the Labor certification used is not suitable for EB2 as they say EB2 labor should be requiring "Masters or BS+5Years Exp", which makes sense.
My Attorney filed an MTR (I290B) on 03/11/2008 and requested the USCIS NSC center to re-consider my case as EB-3 instead as EB2.
Today 03/21/08 i just got an update from USCIS saying:
Current Status: Appeal/Motion/Certification sent to Administrative Appeals Office for review.
On March 21, 2008, we sent this case to the Administrative Appeals Office for review. You will be notified by mail when a decision is made, or if the office needs something from you. If you move while this case is pending, call customer service.
1- So now what are the chances of my I-140 getting approved and how many days does the AAO take to make any decision on this?
2- And for my 485/EAD/AP/FP i did not get any message saying that they are denied and my wife is still working on her EAD on advice of the attorney and as the I-140 is with AAO can she still continue the same job until the decision is made on the I-140 and 485.
Please help me out and advice on what should i be doing at this point and what are my options on this.
Thank you all for your advices and help.
As i said earlier my I-140 was denied for the reason below
I have US masters and 4+years of US job experience and My I-140 was filed in EB2 using a Substitution labor which as the education/experience requirements of (14) Masters+1years experience or (15) Bachelors + 3Years Experience and it was denied without RFE saying the Labor certification used is not suitable for EB2 as they say EB2 labor should be requiring "Masters or BS+5Years Exp", which makes sense.
My Attorney filed an MTR (I290B) on 03/11/2008 and requested the USCIS NSC center to re-consider my case as EB-3 instead as EB2.
Today 03/21/08 i just got an update from USCIS saying:
Current Status: Appeal/Motion/Certification sent to Administrative Appeals Office for review.
On March 21, 2008, we sent this case to the Administrative Appeals Office for review. You will be notified by mail when a decision is made, or if the office needs something from you. If you move while this case is pending, call customer service.
1- So now what are the chances of my I-140 getting approved and how many days does the AAO take to make any decision on this?
2- And for my 485/EAD/AP/FP i did not get any message saying that they are denied and my wife is still working on her EAD on advice of the attorney and as the I-140 is with AAO can she still continue the same job until the decision is made on the I-140 and 485.
Please help me out and advice on what should i be doing at this point and what are my options on this.
Thank you all for your advices and help.
more...
makeup girlfriend selena gomez bikini
speddi
10-17 10:40 PM
It is recommended to stay on H1 until 485 is approved.
girlfriend Selena Gomez wearing a ikini
![selena gomez bikini 2011 pics. [+147] SELENA GOMEZ BIKINI](http://whatwomansay.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/dfde446eelenabikini.jpg "[+147] SELENA GOMEZ BIKINI")
shantak
03-01 09:45 AM
I am also looking for form I-131.
The current form expired on 02/282009, so they might be working on revision.
I agree with you. The current form expired on 2/28 so they might post a new form tomorrow
The current form expired on 02/282009, so they might be working on revision.
I agree with you. The current form expired on 2/28 so they might post a new form tomorrow
hairstyles selena gomez bikini with
rsk73
10-12 04:11 PM
Hi All,
I have an approved I-140 from an employer X. I-140 was approved 2 years ago. And last year I left X company and took a full time position. Since X is my frined he did not mind leaving his company at that time.
I applied for 485 in July as a future employee for X using that approved I-140. I got EAD and AP also.
Now we got into some money issues and he wants to revoke my I-140/I485?
Can he do that?
Please advice.
Thanks in advance.
I have an approved I-140 from an employer X. I-140 was approved 2 years ago. And last year I left X company and took a full time position. Since X is my frined he did not mind leaving his company at that time.
I applied for 485 in July as a future employee for X using that approved I-140. I got EAD and AP also.
Now we got into some money issues and he wants to revoke my I-140/I485?
Can he do that?
Please advice.
Thanks in advance.
julia0345
05-07 12:37 AM
thanks...:)
h1techSlave
06-15 11:42 AM
I think your numbers are correct.
Did you know that more than 1 million green cards were issued in 2009 and less than 60,000 went to actual high skilled immigrants??
Did you know that more than 1 million green cards were issued in 2009 and less than 60,000 went to actual high skilled immigrants??
